Free Essay: The Bias in the U.S Media Coverage on Terrorism and the War on Terror
The events of the September 11, 2001 terror attack resulted in effects that were devastating with a high death toll and it also jeopardized the American economy. Clearly, the media depicts the notion of the U.S.A journalism fraternity as biased in its commitment to transparent and fair coverage on the war of terror and terrorism. Analysis of the media coverage indicates that during the attack, internal shifts in TV media resulted in different coverage styles as compared to other instances of war, conflict, and crisis. This was evidenced by large in how the audience perceived the framed global terror issues (Edwards and Cromwell 13). This essay will focus on The Bias in the U.S Media Coverage on Terrorism and the War on Terror.
Throughout the globe, media channels like newspapers, TV, new social media sites, and other communication channels are looked upon as a necessity. Numerous reports indicate more than 78 percent of the global populace has access to at least one if not all these media in the span of a day. The manner in which these tools are used in all circumstances results in great social, political, and economic impact not just within the country but across the borders. As such, coverage on any incidence demands great consideration on the kind of impact it will have (Edwards and Cromwell 45).
As is portrayed by Fox News, MSNBC, and CNN coverage, it is clear that indirect support from the media fraternity through the excessive projection of terror incredibly contributed to the aggressive nature through which countries got involved in the wars. In his studies, George made the discovery that TV was the only media with the capability of reporting more than 8 stable forms of violence within an hour. As it was discovered, these presentations which were biased on aggressive models displayed a negative influence not only on economic, social, and political factors but on individual psychological development and especially among children (MacChesney 432).
A typical study on how the media covers terror attacks has continued to depict the public exposed to such kind of materials has the capacity of desensitizing public notion on violence as such, ultimately inducing them into accepting to take part in that kind of crisis. This kind of coverage results in intolerable and inhuman acts like vandalism, riots, and bombings. This kind of coverage that is biased during terror attacks by major television networks just helped turn the incident into pointless dram through branding the attackers as radical groups while those attacked are termed as calm, peaceful nations with rationales (Edwards and Cromwell 230).
Through their constant emotive language, the media in the course of such attacks can be negatively used to instigate and motivate conflict leading to a further increase of such incidences. In his article, George Crimsy supports previous scholars by criticizing them exclusively for the mechanism that underlines such as breaking news. He states that some of the reports that are inexperienced often utilize this chance to create a state of dilemma and also forecast doom (MacChesney 432).
The biased coverage nature on terror is currently the major cause of alarm. Psychologists have made the discovery that it is such sensational, inconsiderate, and biased coverage n the U.S.A that results in backward growth, ignorance, and arrogance on the impact of terror on American citizens (Macchensey 442(. It is expected that this will have an effect that is negative on the social-economic progress of the nation as well as the global community. As such, the media industry is supposed to portray reports in an objective manner that is aimed at fighting terrorism in a manner that is positive.
Edwards, David, and David Cromwell. Israel and Palestine an Eye for an Eyelash Mac grow publishers. N.p. 2009. Print. Pp. 134-300.
McChesney, Robert. Telling the Truth at the Moment of Truth: U.S. News Media and the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq. N.p. 2008. Print. Pp. 1-529