Sample Essay Paper on Case Law

Case Law

Factual Background

This is a case that was presented to the Supreme Court of Washington by Julia D. Manning, previously known as Julia D. Huschke who was appealing the case from Superior Court’s decision in King County. The accused were Tenco Incorporated Company and the Washington Corporation. The case was heard on 25th January 1962.

General Area of Law Involved

The case was built and based on the rule which specifies the “action by purchaser against vendor for specific performance of earnest money agreement”. The decision that was reached in Superior Court, King Countymade an order to the vendor, Julia D. Huschketo deliver the realty to the purchaser. The vendor in this case was not satisfied by the Superior Court’s decisionhence she was forced to appeal and the case ended up in the Supreme Court of Washington State.

Court’s Conclusion

The decision arrived at by Chief Justice Finley brought into fore the Statute of Frauds in its ruling. The decision by the Supreme Court upheld that the earnest money agreement which contained property descriptions that were erroneous.This is by virtue of mutual mistakes which could be reformed in order to ensure that not only intended actions of the parties involved have been reflected but also the agreement. After the reforms on the intentions and agreement of the parties, the Supreme Court of Washington reached the decision that the statute of frauds was not violated hence it could be enforced specifically in line with the case. The decision was affirmative as it demanded the vendor, Julia D. Huschke to convey the realty to the purchaser. The evidence from the trial courts was substantive, that is, it proved beyond reasonable doubt that the vendor had to convey the realty.