Sample English Article Review Essay Paper on Rhetorical Structures

Rhetorical Structures

The research articles’ introductions vary in terms of their respective applied rhetorical organizations in the academic work, from different nations of the world. Considering the Brazilian, Portuguese, and English in line with the field of Applied Statistics, a number of analytical tools such as Create a Research Space (CARS) have shown the emerging differences. Specific parts of a research paper play crucial roles with respect to the capability and general literal preparation of the community – the significance realized in the particular research field. By comparing the different approaches and methodologies applied by Brazil, Portugal, and France, we realize that there are various scholars who prefer favoring solidarity with an objectivity of getting rid of the possible conflicting aspects with the community concerned.

In the process of making comparisons of the different rhetorical structures, particularly for the three nations, different scholars have undertaken analysis of the CARS models, together with their respective moves. Duenas, in his journal, concluded that all the moves were used with high frequency levels with all the steps being used, in line with applications of cyclic patterns and move four being the longest. The same conclusions were gathered from Anthony, who, in his journal of software engendering, talked of move three as being the longest one in use.

Posteguillo, in 199, in his journal of computer science, conducted an analysis of the various structures put in place in research papers with respect to computer science. He considered twelve journals, concluding that they all had cyclic patterns with move three being the longest, being concurrent with the results generated by Ping, 2010, despite using 40 journals. Candarli, in his journal on education came up with the same findings as Posteguillo and Ping, though he analyzed a total of 40 journals, comprising of 20 English and 20 in Turkish.

Maswana, Kanamaru and Tajino, 2015, came up with a full paper of on Engineering, with close analysis of rhetorical structure in different engineering fields, with respect to CARS. Their analysis concluded on the application of cyclicity with move three being the longest in the occupation of the niche. Shehzard, 2007, in his academic work on Computer Science, analyzed 56 journals, concluding that only move one was used in the IT field by then.

Chek Mik Loi, 2010, in his journal of cultural differences existing between two languages; English and Chinese, analyzed the English and Chinese articles. He concluded that both move 2 and 3 are the longest in the two languages. Hirano, 2009, in his Journal of Applied Linguistics, compared different rhetorical structures for Brazil, Portugal, and England, in line with rhetorical structure, across twenty journals. He concluded that all the moves were used equally with the same expression, with none of them emerging longest or dominant over the other ones.