It has been found that, dogma refers to a set of standards that are established by a power, as indisputably proper. This serves as the primary foundation of a belief or certainty structure, which cannot be altered or destroyed without influencing the very structure`s paradigm. The connotation also regards acceptable notions of theorists or rational disciplines, civil edicts, faith, and in some case choices of partisan power (Journet, 2011). In religious terms, dogma regards fundamental doctrine that must be retained by every advocate of that religion. In this sense, they are theological codes of conviction that are regarded to be generally approved upon. Hence, this implies that their projected contention and amendment successfully entails that an individual no longer recognizes the given religion.
In historical terms, religion is a means of fundamentally arranging huge collections of individuals who will not have associated with each other in any mode. In this way, religion permitted establishment of essential identity for larger collections of individuals as they evolved from hunter-gatherers to agrarian civilizations towards city-states and subsequent nationhood. Religion established the attachment means for the increasing collections of people that were forming. As such, it became the context for a fundamental cipher and structure of evenhandedness founded on celestial vengeance. Groups of people that employed religion efficiently became more authoritative and relocated other populace that did not found on it as an effective means of administering the populace.
To this end, other aspects of religion seem to ground issues, and the first item is the problem of faith. For efficient management of the public, such group of people has to possess unquestionable faith that what they were told is true. This results to a physically powerful doctrine of belief, which demands conviction without ever inquiring. As such, the next problem is that there is a missing judge or ruler, this is because, in practical terms, the divinity does not emerge in person to make certain or articulate verdict on the populace that suppose in it. Hence, it drops into the power of other personnel to decide what is correct and erroneous. Thus, humans chose what the communication should be, as well as the manner it should be pursued. They carry out this as agents of their deity and most probably backed up by the authority of the particular god.
Through time, such endeavor begins accumulating tremendous influence in control of very few representatives of their god. Thus, since thy presumably act on behalf of their god, their decisions may not be questioned in any case. The individuals that possess such influence are occasionally the persons that are by character motivated to assert authority in addition to influence over other populace, in many instances results to unfortunate consequences of war. This is evident from the account of most historical massacres, where there is evidence of an authoritative frontrunner that controlled enormous levels of indisputable authority. Further, in many instances, such authority was acquired through religion, and in some, it was acquired through communal production, for instance, principles like the use of racial identities.
In essence, almost every instance depicts a scenario where authority trickles down to a small collection of individuals with tremendous levels of authority. Such individuals make horrifying conclusions with no one capable of challenging their ruling since it is prohibited in various ways. Thus, it can be concluded that faith and dogma holds back the capacity to query what is correct and what is erroneous. These in many instances results of horrific outcomes (wars) since the positions of such magnitudes are misused.
Journet, C. (2011). What Is Dogma? San Francisco: Ignatius.