Free Essay: Market Exploitation by Individual Economic Actor
Definition and Explanation of Exploitation
Exploitation is defined based on prevailing circumstances, therefore, has different meanings. For the purpose of our study, exploitation is defined from the perspective of the impact and operations of colonial powers on their colonies. Being the case, interactions occurred between colonial masters and different countries leading to creation of exploitation grounds, which existed at market level, industrial level and at the individual level as revealed by periodic articles. This essay will focus on Market Exploitation by Individual Economic Actor.
Under industrial level, the explanation of exploitation generates the notion of forced labor. A close evaluation of the actions of colonial powers reveals operations in which workers carried out under low payments. The type of exploitation that existed between employees and employing companies led to the rise of oppression in different colonies and currently, labor unions look into economic and social welfare of workers.
Besides the relationship that existed between workers and the colonial industries they worked for, another type of exploitation transpired at the national level. At the level, people were evacuated forcefully from their farmlands by colonial masters with an aim of creating agricultural farms and different industries (Walton & Rockoff 93).
European colonies were indeed affected by change in operations of their colonial masters bearing in mind the kind of lives they enjoyed before intrusion. Colonial powers controlled resources identified within their colonies. They also extracted natural resources and shipped them for industrial production in their countries. These demonstrations account for poor relationships between colonial powers and their colonies.
On the other hand, colonial powers played a crucial role in ensuring enhanced economic performance and in modernizing different government structures. Development in social, political and economic sectors is very evident. Even so, one has to take a deeper look into issues such as colonial governance as the case unfolds based on this study (Walton & Rockoff 99).
Racial discrimination creates a gap between populations across the globe and it is evident in different studies. Today, employment in different employment sectors especially political economies is based on racial confinement. One may not get employment in a specific industry because of race and to some extent; we are still living in post-colonial era.
Relationship between colonies, England, and outbreak of wars
Native Americans have over the years felt the impact of British colonial power in their territories. America had faced a number of challenges under the control of British Empire before early 1770s. The country is also a potential agricultural state and the interest of British colony was mainly to convert skilled American labor into production of farm outputs and to ensure more concentration on agricultural firms.
The Americans in one way felt that Britain was converting their farms into unproductive uses after taking over from them. Additionally, Native Americans were opposed to the idea of forced labor and therefore, could not stand oppression. As a result, the possibility of giving out the land and allowing for full control by the British had to come to an end with decorum. Native Americans had to ensure maximum control of their lands and available resources.
It was however very hard to appreciate British colony’s oppressive act within America because Native Americans had long established relationships amongst them. The American development structure also dates back to the time when settlers moved from Europe in search of fertile farmlands. Besides America, different countries became British colonies with majority being African nations (Walton & Rockoff 221).
One would to some extent argue that the urge to control African territory emerged because of its production potential. Colonial powers also scrambled for resources in Africa including agricultural products, cheap labor force and minerals. The involvement of the colonial powers in African territory led to uprisings in a bid to gain independence by the Native Americans. Africans in totality offered different reactions towards colonial powers and did not take in little.
British Empire explored different ways of controlling her colonies and ensuring African leaders are closely monitored to regulate all opposing forces as they emerged from various groups. Even so, many countries could not allow their citizens to continue working under colonial powers because of the kind of treatment they had obtained.
The use of dialogue also could not have offered immediate results as expected by the colonies leading to boycotts and wars deemed fit for resolving colonial issues (Walton & Rockoff 220). British colonies also had to get support from different parts of the globe more specifically from the American people as witnessed in many African countries. This reveals that different countries were having rough opposing colonial rule. If it were not for bloodshed, British Empire could have maintained its control over most of its colonies.
Bulmer-Thomas, Victor, John H. Coatsworth, and Conde R. Cortés. The Colonial Era and the Short Nineteenth Century. Cambridge [u.a.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006. Print.
Walton, G. M., & Rockoff, H. History of the American Economy. Mason, Ohio: South-Western/Cengage Learning, press, 2010. Print.