Linguistic Limitations to Writing Critical Thinking Papers

Linguistic Limitations to Writing Critical Thinking Papers

You could have strong points for your creative thinking papers, but if your linguistic presentation and organization is poor, it will do you no good. Below are some linguistic limitations that you should watch out for when writing critical thinking papers:

Use of jargon– it is true that in some context, an idea is better expressed using specific words. However, this does not imply that you should use words that make a simple text complex. In the event that you have to use jargon, define the terms.

Ambiguity– it is the use of words or expressions that have more than one meaning, thereby making it difficult for the reader to understand the intended meaning. Focus on using words and expressions that have a singular meaning in a specific context.

Using judgmental words– when writing critical thinking papers, it is paramount that you differentiate between being judgmental and making a judgment. The latter involves deriving a conclusion based on information presented while the former involves having emotional attachment on beliefs held, whether true or otherwise. Use of judgmental words implies that you state opinions as though they were facts. To overcome this, know the difference between opinions and facts when writing critical thinking papers.

Using false implications– the language used reflects accuracy and clarity but it is incorrect as it suggests something that is not based on facts. To overcome this, read widely and have an open mind so that you understand facts in different contexts and how relevant are the facts in the specific content.

Meaningless comparisons– the writer implies that the relationship between two variables is superior and inferior, and then detracts from the perspective without justifying it. To write critical thinking papers effectively, do not make judgments if the objects of comparison are not clear.