Essay Writing Help on Access Control Systems & Security Personnel

Access Control Systems & Security Personnel

Access control systems are not perfect devoid of a human resource element. They represent the systems that facilitate an establishment to manage access to sections and resources within it or in its computerized systems. Some examples of access control systems encompass physical security (for instance, turnstiles, guards, and fences), Personnel Identification Systems (for instance, tamper-resistant identity cards that are normally employed for access allowed for cardholders) and Visual Assessment and Surveillance Systems (for instance, CCTV and surveillance cameras (Phillips 123-155). For perfect access control systems, a human resource component is vital since; to start with, an individual or individuals must make a choice to use access control systems and could be responsible for ascertaining its purpose. Moreover, such individual(s) could be responsible for the control of the deployment or dispensation of images or other data acquired by virtue of the systems.

Another human resource component that is crucial to complete access control systems is the system user. This signifies the individual or individuals that are hired or contracted by the systems operator(s). The system user has direct access to live or captured images and any other data acquired for the application of the access control systems. The people or organizations mulling over the necessity to deploy access control systems ought to give appropriate deliberation to the establishment of a human resource component for apposite governance measures. For perfection, there has to be an evident responsibility and answerability for the human resource components. It is essential to have a designated person or persons accountable for the application and use of access control systems for ensuring proper consultation, in addition to transparency, over their functions, operations and for evaluating how successfully they fulfill their functions (Welsh and Farrington 716-745).

Dedicated security personnel are essential in every organization. One of the mistakes made by many organizations is the deployment of a security officer (traditionally referred to as watchman) instead of dedicated security personnel. Security officers are hired to protect material goods, structures, or other people and are normally privately and officially hired civilian personnel that are generally uninformed and seek to protect property through maintenance of an enhanced visibility presence with the purpose of preventing criminal and unsuitable behaviors. Security officers report any occurrence of such things as criminal activity, fire, or disorderliness to their bosses or emergency services soonest possible (Piza, Caplan and Kennedy 1-29). However, in some situations, the security officers could err leading to huge losses. Therefore, the overall cost and success are the key differentiating aspects between security officers and dedicated security personnel.  

Dedicated security personnel offer a completely dissimilar value. Unlike security officers, dedicated security personnel are perfectly trained to carry out heedful foot patrols, interrelating with people on-the-scene, ensuring careful observations, making opportune responses to calls for service, and probing issues just to mention a few. Since the dedicated security personnel are trained to particular requirements of the property and have the chance to discover first-hand the requirements of the society, they are exclusively devoted and competent to the maintenance of security and order (Stutzer and Zehnder 1-14). Nonetheless, some organizations feel that they are just big enough for a security officer and not for dedicated security personnel. Though every organization ought to have robust security operations through deployment of dedicated security personnel, such organizations do not as they still harbor the no crime, pre-internet approach. Though they may argue that hiring dedicated security officers is more expensive, the losses they make in occurrence of crime are far greater. What is then the best way of preventing such vulnerabilities? It is only through ensuring every organization has dedicated security personnel.                

Works Cited

Phillips, Coretta. “A review of CCTV evaluations: Crime reduction effects and attitudes towards its use.” Crime Prevention Studies 10.1 (1999): 123-155. Web. 5 Feb. 2014. <http://www.popcenter.org/library/crimeprevention/volume_10/05-Phillips-CCTV_Evaluations.pdf>

Piza, Eric L., Joel M. Caplan, and Leslie W. Kennedy. “Is the punishment more certain? An analysis of CCTV detections and enforcement.” Justice Quarterly 31.6 (2014): 1-29.

Stutzer, Alois, and Michael Zehnder. “Is camera surveillance an effective measure of counterterrorism?” Defence and Peace Economics 24.1 (2013): 1-14.

Welsh, Brandon C., and David P. Farrington. “Public area CCTV and crime prevention: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis.” Justice Quarterly 26.4 (2009): 716-745.