Custom Essay Writing Service Paper on Leadership in Information Technology

Leadership in Information Technology


Times have changed and so have businesses. Previously, tradition dictated the way of doing things. Nowadays, technology has slowly replaced the ‘usual’ way. Every business is striving to excel in their leadership style (Austin, Nolan & O’Donnell 2013). Competition among organizations is in the very air to take the lead for reliable leadership strategies. This paper will explain the procedure for the creation, implementation and execution of organizational processes and structures in Department of the Navy Chief Information Officer. It is not enough to address the how question without establishing why it is necessary. Therefore, the same paper shall expound on the reasons for the strategies. As the success does not come on a silver platter, there are roadblocks to successful design and implementation, which the paper seeks to address. The motivation that urges the firm forward is the result it hopes to achieve. The paper cannot, therefore, be complete without expounding on the anticipated results.

Importance of Implementation

Leadership is indeed an essential skill. It is also a learning process. A leader should develop as fast as the world grows. The world today experiences technological advances on a daily basis. It is the embracing of this progress that makes leaders suitable for the job at hand. The skills required in handling a situation today may be irrelevant tomorrow due to the developments that occurred in the course o the night. Therefore, a good leader yesterday may not necessarily be a good leader today. It is the reason the leadership strategy must be given a priority to ensure leaders flow with the current.

Job specifications are important as they define the role of every department and individual within an organization (Szewczak & Snodgrass 2002). In as much as a leader cannot be an expert in all the areas, they need an acquaintance with the activities entailed within each department. The knowledge will assist them in asking the right questions. Competent leadership calls for understanding of all the spheres of operation within a firm. A leader who is knowledgeable about the information department is aware of what needs blurting out and what calls for utmost confidentiality.

If a leader cannot point out at the pros and cons of new technology, they are likely not to reap its full benefits. Worse still, it can cost a business a lot (Szewczak et al. 2002). It is only a knowledgeable leader who knows how the emerging technology can be helpful in reducing the decision cycle while saving the time for other development matters. Issues related to quick access to the final consumer are best understood by a leader who is up-to-date with technology. Conservatism in leadership leaves a leader with a traditional mindset irrelevant in the growing technology. It is a grave matter to trust the life of an organization to a leader that cannot shape its future due to lack of technological exposure.

The Implementation Process

As West (2012) explains, in order to realize the desired results, the leader needs to be adequately informed. There are several tips to provide the guidance in the creation, implementation and execution of organizational processes and structures.

The manager need to focus his/her attention on problem formulation to understand how precisely the challenge came about. It is likely to miss out on the bigger picture and concentrate on matters that matter the least. The problem analysis should, therefore, be systems-oriented. The list of possible solutions could be endless. However, it is the degree of effectiveness that makes the variations distinct. A leader must learn to give a close scrutinization to each viable solution. Through screening of all the possibilities, it is easier to point out the ones that cannot stand the test of time and exclude them from the list. Assumptions stated right from the word go have the chance to be proved by the analysis, and it does not matter that the conclusion appears self-evident.

The problem must always carry the weight to shape the desired model. It does not matter that the cheapest model can resolve and still perform. The present question should dictate the model for use (Austin et al. 2013). The problem is the determining factor of what model to use, and not the availability of the model that matters. It could be available but not appropriate for the present challenge.

West (2012) advises that in complicated cases, there is no point in overemphasizing on hi-tech equations, rather, it is necessary to consult an expert. It is unwise to complicate issues further by detailing too much on the unnecessary matters. A competent leader understands that, one gives his/her all during the competition. He should face the challenge as if it is a competition where he strives to be the best and beat the rest. In the struggle to formulate a solution, there are uncertainties that require a precise explanation.

Since it is possible not to achieve the best process, a good leader knows it is cowardice to settle for less. He/she struggles until they achieve the best. It is good to give the best in seeking for a solution (Sebastian 2007). It is rewarding to try out the possibilities than pursue what one already knows and does not require any energy to think through it.

Roadblocks to Success

Poor judgment brought about by the lack of proper expertise is a stumbling block to the implementation process. If there are no interdisciplinary teams in place, the analysis realized may not be up to standard and can lead to below the standard achievements. Once the information manager achieves the problem analysis, the same measure should be used to weigh the decision. If the decision gets more attention than the problem analysis, it is equivalent to solving a problem different the one diagnosed.

If a leader cannot pose the right question right from the onset of the implementation and execution process, it does not matter the perfect answers received. It goes without question that without accurate cost estimations, it is not possible to make the right choices that fit the financial abilities of the organizations (West 2012).

If the leader fails to throw new ideas into the problem analysis, the results may not stand the test of time. Just a short period and the problem recurs.

The Success

The information managers, upon successful implementation and execution, are assured of the appropriate data volume. The “Goldilocks test “requires the capacity not to be too short or long. The firm is equipped right with the core or strategic decisions. The data has relevance to the current decision-making, and it is the whole idea of management information. In addition, the receiver understands the information and is helpful to him/her (Sebastian 2007).

Moreover, the information received is timely to help in decision making. Information leaders have the assurance of data that is accurate, reliable, and whose source they are confident. There is data that is complete and that which will inform a decision. In cases where quick response is the remedy, the leader is on point (West 2012). In times when the management needs to make routine decisions, there is a frequency to meet the needs. There is, therefore, a good match between the timing of the decision process and the information flow requirements (Austin et al. 2013).


Sebastian, M.W. (2007). Information technology leadership perceptions andemployee-centric.       USA: ProQuest.

Austin, D.,Nolan, R.L.,& O’Donnell, S. (2013). Adventures of an IT leader. Massachusetts:          Havard Business School Publishing.

West, A.L. (2012). The modern Ceo: Technology tools, innovation, and guidebook. Author           House: Bloomington.

Szewczak, E., & Snodgrass, C. (2002). Managing the human side of information technology:         Challenges and solutions.Hershey PA: IRM Press.