Criminal Justice Case Studies Paper on The virtue theory

The virtue theory

In this case, the prosecutor needs to consider the kind of a person that he wants to become in his career of prosecution. If the prosecutor decides that he wants to be credible, self-sufficient, diligent and honest, then he must consider the virtues that will help him become such a person. This means that he should evaluate the virtues in question and ask himself which of these virtues will help him become the best prosecutor he wants to become. In other words, he should consider the relevance of the virtues in question in helping him become the best prosecutor he wants to become. For example, in a situation like this one, the prosecutor may decide that an effective prosecutor should do the following. First, he may decide that an effective prosecutor should be diligent because he needs to present facts and truthful information to a court of law. Second, he may decide that an effective prosecutor should be credible because he should ensure that justice is served in the courts of law no matter the consequences (Bugliosi 1). Third, he may decide that an effective prosecutor should be self-sufficient because he should rely on the facts he/she has from the detectives. Fourth, he may decide that an effective prosecutor should be honest because he must tell the truth always.

After the prosecutor decides the kind of a person that he wants to become in his career of prosecution, then he needs to identify the right virtues that he should practice. In other words, he needs to identify these virtues and practice them. This will not only help him to become the person he wants to become, but it will also help him to deal with the ethical dilemma facing him right now. For this reason, he should consider the best option for him to embrace (Welchman 136). In this case, the prosecutor has the option of accepting the plea bargain, rejecting it or reporting the matter to the anti-corruption authorities or any other relevant body.

At this point, it is worth noting that the prosecutor has identified the virtues of honesty, self-sufficiency, credibility and diligence to be relevant in the situation facing him. With respect to these virtues, the option of accepting the plea bargain does not satisfy the virtue of self-sufficiency, honesty, diligence and credibility. On the other hand, the option of rejecting the plea bargain satisfies the virtues of self-sufficiency and diligence, but it does not satisfy the virtue of honesty and credibility. The option of reporting the matter to the anti-corruption authorities or any other relevant body satisfies all the virtues in question because it exposes the issue as a compromising one. Therefore, the most virtuous option is that of reporting the matter to the anti-corruption authority or any other relevant body (Welchman 136). This means that Marks who is the prosecutor should not accept the offer of plea bargain being offered to him by the lawyer of the second defendant. Instead, he should report the matter to the relevant body for him to be a virtuous prosecutor.  

With respect to the above understanding, Marks should practice the above virtues until they become part of his career such that when ethical dilemmas present themselves to him in the future he would be able to handle them effectively. In other words, marks should not accept the plea bargain. Instead, he should practice the virtues of honesty, self-sufficiency, diligence and credibility until these virtues become part of his character in the prosecution career (Welchman 136). If Marks does this, then he would be able to handle ethical dilemmas in the future without struggling with them.

Works Cited

Bugliosi, John. The Art of Prosecution: Trial Advocacy Fundamentals from Case Preparation Through Summation. Flushing, NY: Looseleaf Law Publications, 2000. Print.

Welchman, Jennifer. The Practice of Virtue: Classic and Contemporary Readings in Virtue Ethics. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Pub, 2006. Print.