Assignment Writing Help on Descartes’ Method of Doubt

Descartes’ Method of Doubt

            Descartes’ method of doubt is based on the foundation that a person should not believe everything he/she sees or hears to be a true representation. It focuses on the truth not being really the truth but just a belief that people have set to be the truth. In his method of doubt, Descartes sets aside the truths that can be proved true and others that are just perceptions, and hence cannot be proved true. The Descartes’ method of doubt seeks to use the natural sense or reasoning to bring doubt into what was normally certain. It does not just look at the evidence but the reasoning behind the evidence.

            In his method of doubt, Descartes seeks to bring out the truth that cannot be doubted at all. This truth can pass all the stages of doubts and still stand. In order to accomplish this, Descartes sets out four stages known as meditation that he uses to bring out the final aspect of his method, which cannot be refuted by any forms of doubt.

            Throughout his stages and meditation processes, Descartes seeks to start alienating the truth from perception by using what in normal circumstances people use to make up the truth. Descartes develops different hypotheses to act like sieving agents. If one truth passes one hypothesis, it is subject to the next hypothesis until the point where there will be no more hypotheses to test it on. The truth can be said to be certain. Descartes explores different aspects of studies to make his arguments clear. His first arguments are based on senses. He argues out that from a long distance, our senses lie to us. For instance, from a distance, the sun and the stars look smaller. A person cannot decipher the real shape of an object from a long distance. On the same line, Descartes views that at a close distance, what we see is what is really happening, for instance, being in a class for a lesson.

            He uses the next hypothesis to find if what is felt at a close distance is certain. Descartes argues out that even in a dream, what is real does not change, for example, people’s faces. The face individuals see in a dream of a person they know is the same in real life. There is no difference between real life and dreams. Therefore, by using the same scenario of being in a class for a lesson, the details would also be the same in a dream. Therefore, a person cannot be certain just because something is happening at a close distance that it is certain. For all they know, it could be just a dream. On the same note, there are truths that remain to hold even in dreams. For instance, mathematical concepts.

            Finally, Descartes brings out the most important aspect of his method that is based on reasoning. Mathematical concepts are argued to be perceptions that people came up with. As much as they can be proved, a person cannot be sure that they are certain. Arguments can be developed to counter that. However, there is one simple truth that no arguments can take away from a person’s mind and that is the truth about that person’s existence.

            In all his arguments and stages of his method, Descartes maintains a skeptic nature. He approaches all his arguments with doubts or evidences to support the doubts.